Because i was so net deprived…
i am going to bore you with more of my Vista experience!
First look, aesthetically it’s less boxy and… holed up (however you want to put it) as compared to XP. I must say, i have always been a Mac OS’s fan, mostly because of it’s beauty aesthetically and thereafter, because of it’s ease of use once you got past the first week of playing with it.
Evidentally, Microsoft thinks so too. I am pretty sure there’s a thousand and one sites out there telling everyone about this, but to see this for myself O.o and then having been able to mess around with it for the past few days, it’s quite… fun.
Obviously, though, Microsoft somehow managed to make this beautiful OS painful on the ram. On checking the ram usage, i am seeing a minimum clock-in range of 500 megs. This dumbs down the beauty of the OS. With my old Ibook, which had about 512mb ram, the OS hardly registered (i believe the current OS would be slightly different). XP itself didn’t use very much. It’s not till i run 2-3 Lineage 2 windows that the 1gig ram started sputtering and swearing at me, and that’s considering the immense amount of stuff i have running in the background (Trillian, multiple-tabbed firefox, mp3s… blah).
While it doesn’t matter much to me now, considering my immense 4gig ram (woohoo), it will be stupid to have just 1 gig ram should i upgrade my desktop to Vista.
Still, i like the shadings, shadows and all the beauty of it. At least, since i can’t own a mac for now, i can still own a sub-standard copy of it (yes, i still don’t like microsoft :D)
Not to mention, like Mac, there’s also a “miniature” screencap of your window when you hover over the tabs on the taskbar.
Now, this performance thing amazes me just a little bit. I am not quite sure why it existed, if not for bragging rights or to assure non-techs their pc is 1337. On a personal level, i think most people should know at the back of their heads whether the games/programs they are intending on buying CAN be played to a certain quality on their current machine.
and of course, there would be people like me who conveniently forgets that when new games comes out, and walks out to just buy it, COZ i could. and then i couldn’t play it for eons.
Despite that, This rating thing seems a little… i am not sure how to put it. For dramatic effects? “oh yeah, my pc has a rating of 5.9 (the max)” “oh damn, my pc’s only 2… can only play Vista’s and old games nia, pai seh pai seh”. of course, when you click for more information here and there, i can only see lame help-lines and sales pitches.

The rating though, is related to this little “category” thing. I am not quite sure about the rest of the categories, although it seems only the Games related ones are on “auto categorise”. Basically, whenever i install a game, whether it’s direct install or a port over form my old pc, the category/folder instantly recognises it, and adds it to the Game folder. This “add” though, is more of a quick link area.
This is helpful for some, albeit minor, reasons:
1) when you are forgetful as to where you have put the folders
2) when you want to de-clutter your desktop
3) when you seriously just want to login and play.
The ratings and performance was also meant to be shown with the games. However, it seems that other than the Vista pre-loaded games, it can’t do a comparison with other games that i currently own (which isn’t much). Also, COD4 wasn’t “auto-categorised” for some reason.
I have managed to install the various other things i need, and everything seems to be running fine. Most of the “Enhanced” features, or pre-loaded stuff by Dell, has not been tried because they look and feel TOO COMPLICATED. Obviously, Vista’s widgets-wannabe are working, but it’s not the same
i kinda like the “overlay” feel, plus the panda widget that i was using, plus a whole host of other stuff too.
i mean, i know i shouldn’t compare vista to Mac, it’s just now the aesthetics are sssooo similar, it makes me miss Mac more.
aight end of another long, and useless post!
<3


